Re: Saw III: Violence vs Actual Sex

Last post 06-25-2008, 12:36 PM by Chris. 17 replies.
Page 2 of 2 (18 items)   < Previous 1 2
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  03-08-2007, 5:55 PM 308 in reply to 291

    Angry [:@] Re: Saw III: Violence vs Actual Sex

    we need to have the same attitude as amstadam. they don't get huffy over sex movies. not seen any of those movies at my pub though, which pub and how long ago. the TVs here are for lame ass gambling and sports. let's something about gambling that's abigger issue than watching x movies for f#@ksakes.
  •  03-08-2007, 5:59 PM 309 in reply to 292

    Re: Saw III: Violence vs Actual Sex

    hellyeah. ban religion, i haqve no interest in religion one bit.
  •  06-25-2008, 12:36 PM 329 in reply to 159

    Re: Saw III: Violence vs Actual Sex

    I'm sorry, after studying the OFL Act (albeit several years ago now) I fail to see how the Saw trilogy should get anything other than "Refused Classification". It should be illegal to sell, possess or display for public viewing. Makes me wonder if the OFLC just panders to the big distributors and Hollywood rather than current Australian opinion. Home invasions, kidnapping and torture, car theft, murder... all on the increase and yet popularised in film and TV and none of which is portrayed or "taught" in explicit, erotic films. Even the Indians, chaste and intolerant of public displays of affection brought us the "Kama Sutra".
Page 2 of 2 (18 items)   < Previous 1 2
View as RSS news feed in XML